TECHNICAL STATEMENT
For
most of my recent work I have used a reductive Process of
engraving from the block of clay rather than the conventional
approach of building up the form through a wheel throwing or handbuilding process.
The simple reason for this approach is the fact that the form
and surface desired can not be achieved in any other way despite
the difficulty. This method presents in having to hollow out the
form for eventual firing.
The general approach I take is to create a range of
components from which I can make a selection to produce single
of multiple forms. While I can envisage and aim at producing
general forms at the beginning of the process. the eventual form
is arrived at by responding to particular circumstances and
effects as the making proceeds.
I am conscious of the sculptural dynamics as the work
emerges making adjustments to the form for heightened impact.
The usual beginning is to cut into the block with
knife, cutting wire or textured tool such as a saw blade or
rough cut timber, to create a formal and often pristine slice
though the clay. The clay is then forced apart creating a
contrasting torn and textured surface from the natural breaking
of the clay. If the clay is firmer or allowed to dry for some
time the break will be quite different, offering a sharper
fractured surface.
Gradually a range of components is built up from which
a selection is made to begin a construction often incorporating
the joining of numerous parts to create the whole form.
As there is a difficulty in hollowing out complex and
tall structures often sections are temporarily joined together
to be hollowed out separately and then rejoined prior to firing
or after firing.
Often at this stage further refinements and adjustments
may be made to the form in the way of additional slabs, textures
and knife cuts binging a sculptural integrity to the whole
piece.
The final stage, after the form has firmed to a point
where the surfaces will not be marked, is to hollow out the
centre so that firing can be successfully achieved. This is a
tedious and time-consuming process.
The clay used is a fine white earthenware to which is
added about 20% of 100 mesh calcined alumina. This retains a
refined surface but reduces the risk of warpage and cracking.
As the clay becomes leather hard it is sprayed with a
thin coat of terracotta which, during the final firing, aids the
response of colour during the fuming process.
When dry, the works are fired to 1050℃
in a conventional electric kiln.
The final firing is in a simple outdoor cross-draught
brick kiln which is largely open at floor level to allow the
gases to pass readily through the kiln .The works are placed
above the floor level with enough space for the free flow of
gases. A gas burner is directed beneath the floor towards the
back wall of the kiln.
The firing schedule is to gradually heat the kiln to
700℃ at which point a mixture of copper carbonate, borax and
sodium bicarbonate, in equal parts, is introduced into the kiln
next to the burner on a V-fold piece of cardboard.
This process of introducing approx. 50 grams of the
powdered mixture to the kiln is continued every 50 degrees until
the kiln reaches 1000 degrees at floor level. The gas is then
switched off. A few more loads of copper/soda mix is introduced
into the kiln as it cools and at 700 degrees an L shape metal
pipe is inserted into the burner hole and everything is sealed
with a slurry of clay/sand mix
Once every opening is sealed waste motor oil is
trickled from a tank into the kiln interior creating dense smoke
and hence a severe reduction atmosphere. Should there be a small
gap in the brickwork a fine plume of smoke will appear which
should be immediately sealed with the clay/sand slurry.
The fine dribble of oil should continue to trickle into
the kiln through the metal pipe until the kiln has dropped in
temperature to about 300 degrees. Be aware that the floor of the
kiln can remain hot and there is a risk of the kiln re-oxidizing
if the oil is turned off too early.
Once cool the kiln can be opened.
It seems that here is always some variation in results
although the procedure in firing may seem identical. Despite
many years of firing by this process I am not entirely sure why
such variations occur. At least one can be certain of either
exhilaration or deflation when opening the kiln. If disappointed
in the results there is always the possibility in a second
firing. |