|
COLOR, WHY NOT
The art,
which consists in setting into a kiln an object that shall
receive, through the fire, the Character of ceramic produce,
contains essentially, in its very deep nature the concept of
"becoming", of "unfolding".
All the choices preceding the decisive action of firing are
concentrated on the object, waiting for a promise. As soon as
the firing has began, an inexorable course begins, whose
stages have been precisely imagined; a course supported by an
elan, an intention proving the existence of an active, careful
and loving presence. When the work is achieved, this elan will
run through it and be it's real expression.
By coordinating progressively the transformations with
attention on their signification, it is possible to lead each
transformation to its most typical state, enlacing the leaps
from one quality to the other. Each stage carries the seal of
what is the specificity of ceramic: the hardening of the clay
until its vitrifying: the first sign of the clay until
its vitrifying: the first sign of melting is the glazy surface
of the burnt clay, further on it will be the transparency and
the color of the glaze which is by its very intimate nature
the same than its support, the vitrified clay, of whom new and
unexpected qualities are now developed.
We can feel this progression like an image of what is typical
for life. It does not confine creativity into a schema of
idea, but sustains the creativity by proposing a frame to
observe the phenomenon's involved in the realization of the
ceramic action.
The notion of color developed in my ceramics can be
considered in this sense.
I approach the color as the ultimate issue of a technological
journey, closely bound to the progression of what is--during
the firing--evolving: to begin with the hardening of the form
and thereby its taking place into space, and ending by the
transparency and vibration of the color, which has its origin
in the crystalline quality of the glaze, penetrated by the
light.
The form can be understood as an indispensable armature for
its foundation in reality. The form-by accepting the
color-takes upon itself all that delivers it from its own
function of incarnation, and is thereby thrown into a new
spatial dimension.
The color escapes from the surface that would retain it ,as
if the surface was looking for its own kingdom, for being
something in itself. But in this case, it's not the color's
condition means: to accept the color, which at first, does not
want to be submitted to the form; and stimulate the form to
accept a revolted paretner. Thus appears the polarity between
firmness and fluidity.
This polarity becomes concrete through a manner of working,
which consists in reducing the form to combinations of
surfaces, and the color to a kind of flow passing from one
plane to the other; flow which is modifying itself according
to the sympathy it has for one or the other movement fixed
into the clay.
This stake offers no security, and experience remains the
only point of support for a possible success; it is here that
the possible and inevitable variations must inscribe
themselves, without any complex of perfectionism.
|